futurejournalismproject:

The Stressful Careers of Photojournalists and Newspaper Reporters
Using metrics such as career opportunity, compensation, deadlines, working in the public eye, and danger among others to generate an overall “stress score”, CareerCast has a top ten list of the most stressful jobs of 2013.
Congratulations, photojournalists and newspaper reporters, you’ve cracked the list.
Reiterating what we already know, CareerCast reports:

Two careers in the media industry score highly on the stress scale: photojournalist and newspaper reporter. Professionals from each field can be thrown into the epicenter of dangerous situations, such as war, natural disasters and police chases. Both careers also have declining job opportunities as the 21st century media landscape evolves. Newspaper reporters in particular face a shrinking job market; the BLS estimates a 6% job decline in the industry by 2020.
The growth of online media has transformed the newspaper reporter’s job immensely. The immediacy internet outlets provide can be a useful tool, but it can also be a huge trap. Striving for the fastest reports can lead to inaccuracy and heightened stress. Watchful public eyes are trained on reporters at all times, so an incorrect report can compromise a reporter’s reputation as quickly as they can send a tweet.

The least stressful job for 2013? University professor.
Image: Stressful Careers. Select to embiggen.

Ouch…

futurejournalismproject:

The Stressful Careers of Photojournalists and Newspaper Reporters

Using metrics such as career opportunity, compensation, deadlines, working in the public eye, and danger among others to generate an overall “stress score”, CareerCast has a top ten list of the most stressful jobs of 2013.

Congratulations, photojournalists and newspaper reporters, you’ve cracked the list.

Reiterating what we already know, CareerCast reports:

Two careers in the media industry score highly on the stress scale: photojournalist and newspaper reporter. Professionals from each field can be thrown into the epicenter of dangerous situations, such as war, natural disasters and police chases. Both careers also have declining job opportunities as the 21st century media landscape evolves. Newspaper reporters in particular face a shrinking job market; the BLS estimates a 6% job decline in the industry by 2020.

The growth of online media has transformed the newspaper reporter’s job immensely. The immediacy internet outlets provide can be a useful tool, but it can also be a huge trap. Striving for the fastest reports can lead to inaccuracy and heightened stress. Watchful public eyes are trained on reporters at all times, so an incorrect report can compromise a reporter’s reputation as quickly as they can send a tweet.

The least stressful job for 2013? University professor.

Image: Stressful Careers. Select to embiggen.

Ouch…


futurejournalismproject:

How We Talk About North Korea
Via Alex Pareene:

[North Korea] is the sort of story that our news media is absolutely awful at covering. Most people on cable news are brainless idiots hired primarily for their ability to talk on camera for long periods of time without saying “uh” that often, and even when they have a simplistic-but-workable grasp of domestic affairs they rarely know shit about the rest of the world. North Korea is a secretive hermit state that even the CIA can’t penetrate, and every report on the capabilities and motivations of the primary actors there will by necessity involve a lot of guesswork…
…This rampant uninformed speculation seems harmless until you recall the sort of effect hysterical uniformed speculation has had on America’s foreign policy in the past. It became clear in the run-up to the Iraq War that the news media was a very useful tool to get the public on board with wars. Through insinuation and misdirection, the false notion that Saddam Hussein was in some way responsible for 9/11 was spread with very few examples of actual lies from the administration — they just made the suggestions and let the idiot-media run with it.

Via Jack Shafer:

Like sportswriters, political reporters, financial news staffers, reporters on the police beat, and other breaking-news artists, foreign correspondents must tell their story with economy and describe what has happened as opposed to why something happened. “Typical Mindbending $#*! By the North Koreans” may accurately describe the latest provocation or retreat by Pyongyang, but it’s not the way breaking news generally gets framed…
…A brief survey of North Korea news clips reveals a spate of clichés… Pyongyang reliably remains defiant; talks have resumed or been proposed, canceled,or stalled, while a U.S. envoy seeks to lure the North back to those talks to restart the dialog; North Korea is bluffing,blustering, or is engaging in brinksmanship; tensions are grim, rising, or growing—but rarely reduced, probably because when tensions go down it doesn’t qualify for coverage; North Korea seeks recognition, respect, or improved or restored relations, or to rejoin the international community, or increased ties to the West that will lead to understanding; deals with North Korea are sought; North Korea feels insulted and is isolated by but threatens the West; the Japanese consider the North Koreans “untrustworthy“; the West seeks positive signs or signals or messages in North Korean conduct but worries about its intentions; diplomats seek to resolve, solve, respond to, overcome, defuse, the brewing, serious, real crisis; the escalating confrontation remains dangerous; the stakes are high, but the standoff endures.
The reliance on stock phrases indicates a lack of imagination on the part of foreign correspondents (and their editors), who if they are serving old wine they should find some new bottles from which to decant it. But it also confirms Shafer’s First Law of Journalistic Thermodynamics, which states, “Copy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only change form.” North Korea coverage reiterates itself in language that is as pale as dead coral because, of course, the North Koreans insist on echoing themselves, even when acquiring new weapons, such as nuclear bombs and missiles. We’re in no position to ask the North Koreans to speak their minds more articulately (or honestly) but we’re within our rights to ask our favorite hacks to dump the hackneyed.

Alex Pareene, Salon, Pretending to Know about North Korea.
Jack Shafer, Reuters, The Enduring Cliche’s of North Korea Coverage.
Image: Korean peninsula at night, 2012, via NASA/Wikimedia Commons.

futurejournalismproject:

How We Talk About North Korea

Via Alex Pareene:

[North Korea] is the sort of story that our news media is absolutely awful at covering. Most people on cable news are brainless idiots hired primarily for their ability to talk on camera for long periods of time without saying “uh” that often, and even when they have a simplistic-but-workable grasp of domestic affairs they rarely know shit about the rest of the world. North Korea is a secretive hermit state that even the CIA can’t penetrate, and every report on the capabilities and motivations of the primary actors there will by necessity involve a lot of guesswork…

…This rampant uninformed speculation seems harmless until you recall the sort of effect hysterical uniformed speculation has had on America’s foreign policy in the past. It became clear in the run-up to the Iraq War that the news media was a very useful tool to get the public on board with wars. Through insinuation and misdirection, the false notion that Saddam Hussein was in some way responsible for 9/11 was spread with very few examples of actual lies from the administration — they just made the suggestions and let the idiot-media run with it.

Via Jack Shafer:

Like sportswriters, political reporters, financial news staffers, reporters on the police beat, and other breaking-news artists, foreign correspondents must tell their story with economy and describe what has happened as opposed to why something happened. “Typical Mindbending $#*! By the North Koreans” may accurately describe the latest provocation or retreat by Pyongyang, but it’s not the way breaking news generally gets framed…

…A brief survey of North Korea news clips reveals a spate of clichés… Pyongyang reliably remains defiant; talks have resumed or been proposed, canceled,or stalled, while a U.S. envoy seeks to lure the North back to those talks to restart the dialog; North Korea is bluffing,blustering, or is engaging in brinksmanship; tensions are grim, rising, or growing—but rarely reduced, probably because when tensions go down it doesn’t qualify for coverage; North Korea seeks recognition, respect, or improved or restored relations, or to rejoin the international community, or increased ties to the West that will lead to understanding; deals with North Korea are sought; North Korea feels insulted and is isolated by but threatens the West; the Japanese consider the North Koreans “untrustworthy“; the West seeks positive signs or signals or messages in North Korean conduct but worries about its intentions; diplomats seek to resolve, solve, respond to, overcome, defuse, the brewing, serious, real crisis; the escalating confrontation remains dangerous; the stakes are high, but the standoff endures.

The reliance on stock phrases indicates a lack of imagination on the part of foreign correspondents (and their editors), who if they are serving old wine they should find some new bottles from which to decant it. But it also confirms Shafer’s First Law of Journalistic Thermodynamics, which states, “Copy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only change form.” North Korea coverage reiterates itself in language that is as pale as dead coral because, of course, the North Koreans insist on echoing themselves, even when acquiring new weapons, such as nuclear bombs and missiles. We’re in no position to ask the North Koreans to speak their minds more articulately (or honestly) but we’re within our rights to ask our favorite hacks to dump the hackneyed.

Alex Pareene, Salon, Pretending to Know about North Korea.

Jack Shafer, Reuters, The Enduring Cliche’s of North Korea Coverage.

Image: Korean peninsula at night, 2012, via NASA/Wikimedia Commons.




koreastandardtime:

Al Jazeera has an interesting report about efforts to rehabilitate poor neighborhoods in Seoul and Busan by respecting the existing contours of the area, rather than forcing them into predictable, cookie-cutter layouts. Famed South Korean architect Seung Hyo-sang: “Construction companies dominated everything, so they erased most of the memories inscribed on our land. That is the main problem.”

This is a topic I’d love to read more about. Little by little, bit by bit, South Korean urban redevelopment projects are exhibiting a heightened appreciation for aesthetics and quality of life issues. Seoul is certainly no one’s idea of a beautiful city, but it has come a long way from what it used to look like 15 to 20 years ago.



inothernews:

The government doesn’t just take a little off the top: these are the only 28 hairstyles / haircuts people may get in North Korea.  Don’t tell Kim Jong-Un’s new best friend and ignorer of forced famine and oppression Dennis Rodman, okay?  (via The New York Daily News)

(via ohheythereworld)


koreastandardtime:

The latest chapter in the “The Ballad of Jong-un and Dennis” unfolded Sunday with Dennis Rodman’s appearance on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos.” In an interview about the ex-NBA star’s trip last week to Pyongyang, Stephanopoulos asked Rodman some logical questions about his overly enthusiastic embrace of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, such as, “Were you aware of his threats to destroy the United States and his regime’s horrendous record on human rights?” Rodman’s responses were predictably lame, peppered with weasley phrases like “I don’t condone that, I hate the fact that he’s doing that.”

But as Stephanopoulos noted in his intro to the interview, “Rodman now has more first-hand impressions of Kim than any other American,” including anyone in the U.S. government. So in the spirit of an intelligence-gathering debriefing, let us review some of the tidbits of information that Rodman shared with ABC:

1. “The kid’s only 28 years old.”

When Kim Jong-un emerged as his father’s likely successor, North Korea watchers were stumped about his age. By the time he assumed power in late 2011, most believed he was in his late 20s. Last December, Kim Jong-il’s ex-sushi chef Kenji Fujimoto confirmed after a reunion with Kim Jong-un in Pyongyang that the North Korean leader was born on Jan. 8, 1983, which would make him 30. Why did Rodman repeatedly tell Stephanopoulos that Kim is 28? Maybe that’s what Kim told him himself. Or maybe Rodman has his facts mixed up. I’m going with the sushi chef on this one.

2. “He wants Obama to do one thing: call him.”

You’d think that Kim Jong-un and his handlers would know enough not to say something like that to a U.S. visitor – even if that visitor isn’t a diplomat but an ex-basketball player –  unless they want that message to be delivered. Does that mean Kim is ready to hold substantive talks with President Obama?

Probably not. Just a few months after Kim succeeded his late father, the U.S. reached a food-aid-for-nuke-freeze deal with North Korea, only for Pyongyang to torpedo the deal just weeks later with its announced intention to launch a satellite into space. After the humiliating failure of that launch, North Korea pressed on with a successful launch later in the year and its widely condemned third nuclear test in February, despite under-the-radar efforts by the Obama administration to maintain a dialogue with Pyongyang. For Kim to claim that he wants to speak with Obama just weeks after thumbing his nose at the world with the nuke test is just par for the course.

3. “‘I don’t want to do war.’ He said that to me.”

Ditto the above.

4. “He loves basketball.”

We knew that already. But what we didn’t quite appreciate until Rodman’s visit was the depth of Kim’s enthusiasm for the game. It was startling how North Korea’s supreme leader allowed himself to be seen spending so much time with a foreigner who wasn’t a fellow head of state. Some commentators have argued that Pyongyang viewed Rodman’s visit as a propaganda coup, pointing out how state-run media covered his visit to the Juche Tower and the Arch of Triumph.

But I don’t believe that’s the main thing that motivated Kim to give his blessing to the trip. Most North Koreans have never heard of Rodman. And celebrating the visit of a famous American would seem to run counter to the country’s shrill efforts to paint the U.S. as warmongers and the “sworn enemy of the Korean people.” Rather, I think the foremost thought on Kim’s mind was simply, “Holy sh*t, I’m gonna get to meet the Worm!!”

Whatever propaganda value there was to be had from Rodman’s visit would have been the same without the bro-tastic scenes of Kim and the NBA Hall of Famer sitting together to watch a game, knocking back some drinks and embracing each other. The North Korean media’s over-the-top coverage of Rodman’s visit did not come off as a Stalinist’s regime’s attempt to squeeze propaganda value out of a prominent foreigner. Rather, it seemed to reflect a young basketball-crazed kid’s unfettered excitement over getting to hang out with one of his idols – a kid who just happens to have a country’s entire media apparatus at his disposal to project whatever message he wants. And that message clearly seemed to be, “AM I THE SH*T OR WHAT?”

Does that mean the White House should replace Glyn Davies, U.S. special representative for North Korea policy, with Scottie Pippen? Well, no. But Kim’s ardor for b-ball, particularly the Chicago Bulls, does provide genuine insight into the guy’s passions and what makes him tick. If Washington ever finds itself in a dangerous stand-off with Pyongyang, I’d bet some wag in the State Department will joke that they should secretly offer Kim a one-on-one training session with Michael Jordan if he agrees to back off. And that suggestion will be made only half in jest. 

5. “He’s very humble.”

Rodman contradicts his own observation by saying seconds later that, “He loves power. He loves control.” And of course he makes no mention of the Kim family’s oppressive cult of personality, the defense of which has brought unspeakable suffering to millions of North Koreans. But one particularly curious aspect of Rodman’s visit was that Kim didn’t block the participation of Vice, the media company that organized and filmed the trip for an HBO series that’s debuting in April. Vice has previously produced scabrous documentaries about North Korea. They weren’t terribly sophisticated, but they were suffused with an appealing f*ck-you attitude toward North Korea officialdom that you’d think would get them barred from the country permanently.

So why would Kim allow a Vice film crew (if not its founder Shane Smith) back into the country? Clearly Rodman’s inclusion in the package played a major role. But perhaps it also reflects an occasional – if clearly selective – willingness by Kim to overlook transgressions by foreigners who have crossed his regime. The last documented instance was his unexpected reunion last year with Kenji Fujimoto, his father’s ex-sushi chef. After serving as Kim Jong-il’s personal chef for more than a decade – during which he became close with Kim Jong-un – Fujimoto fled North Korea in 2001 and went on to write a tell-all book about his experience. And yet Kim invited him back to Pyongyang for a two-week visit last summer.

6. “What I did was history.”

Because Rodman was the first American to get acquainted with the young leader of the world’s newest nuclear power, you have to grant him that.